Ask a Question
A Call-In Radio Show featuring Atheists from the Tacoma/Seattle Area
Voice Mail Line: (206) 420-0997
  • We’re done trying, but the door is still open.

      11 comments

    We’ve now spent a year trying to get someone in the 9/11 Truth movement to be on the show and have a fair discussion of the facts and evidence that could lead to questioning the official narrative.   No one we’ve contacted has stepped up to the plate .  Instead, we’re seeing people creep into our YouTube channel well after the episode airs, and post-show calls questioning how we handled the episode.

    We don’t care.  No one has been willing to stand with their beliefs on a live episode, with previously agreed to rules to insure a fair conversation.  As far as I’m concerned, that makes those beliefs suspect.

    The Truthers have had the opportunity to be on our show, in front of a microphone, to make sure we get it right.   Monday morning quarterbacking is not interesting.   If you want to ensure we get it right, contact us and we’ll have you on for the debate.

    We won’t hold your hand, we won’t give you the whole hour, and we won’t prevent people from asking you questions.   But we will work to be fair.

    • Comments (10)

    • Trackbacks (1)

    • they know your part of The Man…that’s why

    • “…you’re gatekeepers, maaaaaaaaaaaan!”

    • Like I told Case: I may have to study up on the Truth movement just so he has someone to debate.

    • A fee years ago, Opie & Anthony (xm) were confronted by truthers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3MSIkH2e28c&sns=tw

    • I think it was pointed out that when the first truss failed you can make out the penthouse structures on the roof collapsing from one side to the other. Thus, it’s a mistake to say the building fell in a single, unified piece as the that last caller was suggesting.

    • I had an old friend post a building 7 conspiracy video to facebook on 9/11. It was good to see how many people responded that it was nonsense.

      The “undeniable truth” was was so wholly unamazing that my 9th grader came up with the same likely scenario that I did. If you haven’t seen it, there is a “proof” video where the BBC is anouncing WTC 7 has collapsed, yet in the background you can make out WTC 7 still standing. I find it amzing that someone of average intellect could not see the likely reason (or reasons) this could happen without resorting to conspiracy pap. Not to mention – I can’t even comprehend the weird scenario with which this supposed “leak” could support a conspiracy.

    • Maybe you should tell the Truthers there will be punch and pie if they come. As we learned in South Park, more people will come if they think there’s punch and pie.

    • Jeff, as it happens, we make waffles for anyone on the show!

      The office has a waffle iron.

    • Well then just tell them it’s Free Waffles for Truthers Day and engage them in some friendly conversation while you accidentally leave the microphones on.

    • I used to be an official story supporter until some yrs ago i came across these amongst other things tht troubled me n i want u to tell me wht to make of those. passport of hijacker “magically” recovered whilst whole plane INC BLACK BOXES were demolished, larry silverstein insuring of wtc 7 just weeks be4 911 n him SURPISINGLY GETTING an appointment with the dermatologist on the morning of 911(watch?v=HEb4vxK72TE&list=F­L9EyEXZUdmjHXd-ZVP4FPuw&index=­5). note also tht it was confirmed tht when Silverstein said “pull” there WERE NO FIREMEN in there so he cldnt have meant tht, there being wargames practicing a terror event with planes just days be4 911, building 7 coming straight down evenly WITHOUT first one side breaking off n then perhaps the rest following in an uneven n random pattern, the news lady stating wtc 7 had fallen WHILST IT WAS STILL STANDING clearly in the back of the news studio window, ALL of the black boxes SUPPOSEDLY, BUT i say it again A PASSPORT OF A HIJACKER SUPPOSEDLY SURVIVED, most security footage from the pentagon confiscated with only those tapes from which neither a plane nor anything else can be seen n one can just say “well ofcourse it was a plane, so many ppl supposedly saw it”, OBL NOT BEING INDICTED, GOV NOT DEVIATING FROM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES(NOTE the former gov Jesse Ventura, also a 911truth supporter, PARTCICULARLY stresses when tht happens one ought to be extremely suspicious), thermite samples found in wtc dust BY NON US GOV FUNDED scientists(IF u can show me tht the Journal which published those results ACTUALLY was also considered illegitimate BEFORE they published something related to 911, thenN ONLY THEN, ill consider tht) otherwise tht too is another strong indicator N MUCH MORE 4 which i ask u to see “debunking 911 debunking” here on utube n also look for the debate btw Jesse Ventura and Michael Shermer at google.
      ALSO watch the video by thefollowing atheist showing how the nanothermite theory is LEGIT
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=msq_eXyA0cA&feature=channel_video_title
      THEN come back n tell me if u still think theres nothing extremely fishy abt the official story n whether these rnt strong indications, if not evidence, of the us gov n ultimately the private feds involvement in these attacks. id greatly appreciate it.

    Write a comment




 
X

Contact Ask an Atheist