Ask an Atheist with Sam Mulvey

Ask a Question!

Other Ways to Contact Us

Voice Mail: Ph: 844-SKEPTIC
Direct Email: E:

Leave us a Voice Mail at 844-SKEPTIC

This Week: Sam Hasn't Read Calvin & Hobbes

Hindu Prayers Just As Unconstitutional As Any Other Prayer At City Council Meetings

You know, I really enjoy exposure to cultures outside my own.  And, love it or leave it, religion is a huge part of almost every culture.  I think learning about other peoples traditions and beliefs helps me to feel more comfortable about folks who I might otherwise feel very removed from.  Sharing culture is one of those wonderful experiences that strangely brings people together by exposing people to differences – largely because most cultural differences seem far less alien once people realize the similarities they share with one another in spite of their differences.

However, the way to expose people to other cultures in America cannot come at the expense of  the First Amendment of the Constitution.  

It would seem at two different city council meetings in Utah, that was the very sacrifice that was made in order to expose the people of Utah to Hindu culture – and that is very disappointing.

The story goes, on the evening of July 5th the City Councils of South Jordan and Draper:

…Reverberated with Sanskrit mantras from ancient Hindu scriptures.

He started and ended the prayer with “Om”, the mystical syllable containing the universe, which in Hinduism is used to introduce and conclude religious work. Om was followed by Gayatri Mantra, the most sacred mantra in Hinduism.

And what is the Gayatri Mantra?  Well, there are literally hundreds of different English translations of the mantra.  The mantra itself reads:

Bhuh Bhuvah Svah
Tat Savitur Varenyam
Bhargo Devasya Dheemahi
Dhiyo Yo nah Prachodayat

And is generally described in these terms:

Gayatri Mantra (the mother of the vedas), the foremost mantra in Hinduism and Hindu beliefs, inspires wisdom. Its meaning is that “May the Almighty God illuminate our intellect to lead us along the righteous path”. The mantra is also a prayer to the “giver of light and life” – the sun (savitur).

The prayer and translation described in the article read a little differently:

Reciting from Brahadaranyakopanishad [Mahanarayanopanishad], Zed said ‘Asato ma sad gamaya, Tamaso ma jyotir gamaya, Mrtyor mamrtam gamaya’, which he then translated as ‘Lead me from the unreal to the Real, Lead me from darkness to Light, and Lead me from death to Immortality’.

Though it’s true that some translations of the prayer exist that might be considered almost secular, replacing the word “God” with more airy terms like “Light” and “Life Giver”, the meaning of the prayer is obviously religious and thus, it is in no way in keeping with the establishment clause – the clause contained in the First Amendment which prohibits the preference of one religion over another by the U.S. government.

This prayer being led at the beginning of a city council meeting is just as unconstitutional as any Christian prayer, and should be treated with just as much scorn and dissent.  If you want to share different faiths between people, invite religious representatives to your churches to pray, not to your government meetings.

Current Events, Opinion

Feedback and Commentary

3 Comments 0 Trackbacks
beth July 10, 2011 at 2:12 pm

Here is a comment left on stumble upon: “Bleh, waste of time, they dont condemn anyone or make them feel left out like christians.

They are talking about generic transformation to perfection, not some angry god. If the constitution were a guy, he’d be like “Whatever.””

But that’s not at all true. Constitutionality isn’t something that depends on how dickish the prayer or the people who are leading the prayer are – it’s pretty cut and dry. The prayer is an appeal to a deity (“May the Almighty God illuminate our intellect to lead us along the righteous path”), therefore the prayer involved in a city council meeting is just as unconstitutional as any Christian prayer being said at a government meeting.

We can’t ignore religious influence we like and then condemn religious influence we don’t like when it comes to the constitution. If we started doing that, we’d be no better than any Christian who claims it’s OK to lead a prayer at a city council meeting because the majority of the people there are OK with it.

Kapital July 10, 2011 at 2:38 pm

I agree Beth, constitutionality isn’t contingent on whether the religious group violating the law is “traditionally” nice or aggressive. It also doesn’t matter what sort of deity the prayer is trying to praise.
This prayer should have been held at a church or other location and not on government property during a city council meeting.

Edmond July 12, 2011 at 3:19 pm

What the hell is wrong with simply opening government meetings with the first order of business? What is the point of prayers, invocations, moments of silence, or speeches of ANY kind? Just get to WORK already!


Post a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *